[flickr]photo:6433633069[/flickr]
Chicago and Chicagoland communities have officially adopted plans to provide more transportation opportunities, reduce obesity, and increase access to open space; they list how bicycling is or can be a strategy to achieve a healthy city, a bike-friendly city, and a green city. Here’s a sampling of those agendas:
- Consortium to Lower Obesity in Chicago Children (CLOCC)
- Communities Putting Preventing to Work (CPPW) – Grid Chicago coverage
- Healthy Chicago
- Logan Square Open Space Plan
- Chicago Climate Action Plan
- Bike 2015 Plan – Grid Chicago coverage
- Chicago Pedestrian Plan – Grid Chicago coverage
- CitySpace open space plan
- GO TO 2040 comprehensive regional plan – Read John’s coverage on the launch in 2010
- Did I miss any?
I’d like there to be a Chicago-wide comprehensive plan that addresses goals and strategies outside the scope of these plans but still includes these efforts. A plan that concentrates on transit, congestion, on crime and safety, housing, education and the economy. Its purpose would be the same as the other plans, to outline targets and intentions and measures of achievement, but also to ensure that no plan and the people implementing the plan were working at cross-purposes. For example, if there’s a plan to increase the number of people who bike and the number of people who take transit, are the implementers of each plan working together to ensure a citizen’s smooth transition from one mode to the other in a single trip? Another example: If a goal is to increase the number of people who take transit, are implementers making buses run more on time by reducing single occupancy vehicle congestion and giving buses priorities at signals, two strategies that would speed up bus movement and make it easier to create a schedule they could stick to?
A plan like this that comes to mind is PlaNYC. From the article on Wikipedia about PlaNYC:
PlaNYC is an effort released by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg in 2007 to prepare the city for one million more residents, strengthen the economy, combat climate change, and enhance the quality of life for all New Yorkers. The Plan brought together over 25 City agencies to work toward the vision of a greener, greater New York. PlaNYC specifically targets ten areas of interest: Housing and Neighborhoods; Parks and Public Spaces; Brownfields; Waterways; Water Supply; Transportation; Energy; Air Quality; Solid Waste; Climate Change.
Updated 21:36 to add more plans, thanks to the commenters.
Also the CitySpace plan which came out in ’98. I am led to believe that it is in the process of being updated:
http://www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/dcd/supp_info/cityspace_plan.html
But I agree, it would be nice to see a more holistic approach across agencies.
Thank you, Jason. I’ve added this to the list in the article.
Funny you should mention, Steven, because the official comprehensive plan for our seven-county region just turned one year old in October. It’s called GO TO 2040 and addresses the issues you mention, among many others. See http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2040/. Thanks for helping to increase awareness of the need for effective planning.
Jason, the plan takes quite a thorough approach, as you suggest is necessary. GO TO 2040 includes very detailed strategies for every level from local to national. Its themes — Livable Communities, Human Capital, Efficient Governance, and Regional Mobility — are likewise intended to cover the full range of factors that shape quality of life and prosperity. These themes and their 12 primary recommendation areas are highly inter-related.
Immediately after the plan’s adoption last year, our agency received a $4.25M HUD grant to provide local technical assistance to a broad range of communities seeking to implement principles contained in the plan. See our site’s Moving Forward area for details.
Wow, how did I forget this.
I’m quite familiar with the plan. I visit the website at least once a month to gather information and do research for article topics.
However, was the plan ratified by the Chicago City Council? Or, has the CCC expressed its support in other ways?
Steven, our Board features balanced membership we refer to as “5, 5, and 5,” meaning that the City of Chicago appoints five members, five suburban Cook members are appointed by the County, and five members are appointed by the collar counties (DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will). The GO TO 2040 plan was adopted unanimously by the region as represented by these 15 voting CMAP Board members. Individual votes of adoption were not taken by municipalities (e.g., the Chicago City Council). I hope that helps. Thanks again.
Here’s a piece I wrote for Newcity about the launch of the GO TO 2040 plan: http://votewithyourfeetchicago.blogspot.com/search?q=go+to+2040
I linked it in the article.
Excellent post – we need more work like this to break down the silos across sectors.
Do you mean more comprehensive plans?