Could CDOT’s “Zero in Ten” strategy also work for homicide prevention?


Mural at Drake Avenue and Bloomingdale Avenue in West Logan Square.

[This piece also appeared in Checkerboard City, John’s weekly transportation column in Newcity magazine, which hits the streets in print on Thursdays.]

Each morning Steven and I scan the dailies for sad stories of local pedestrian, bike and transit deaths to adapt for “Fatality Tracker” posts on Grid Chicago, in order to raise awareness of the need for safer streets. And almost every time I look at the papers I also see tragic news about the latest murders, averaging more than one killing per day.

This year the Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) put out two planning documents with the stated goal of eliminating all traffic deaths and crashes within the next ten years. I applaud this bold approach, and I can’t help but wonder out loud if “Zero in Ten” could be successfully applied to our city’s homicide crisis as well.

Released in May, the Chicago Forward Action Agenda is a roadmap for creating a safer, more efficient and more sustainable transportation network for people traveling on foot, bicyclists, transit riders and motorists. The Chicago Pedestrian plan, published in September, lays out more specifics on improving conditions for walking.

To achieve the safety goal, Chicago Forward lists dozens of different action items under the categories of evaluation, engineering, enforcement and education. These include studying the ten worst intersections for crashes in the city each year, as well as analyzing all fatal crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists, and implementing short- and long-term improvements to these locations to prevent future collisions.

Meanwhile, the pedestrian plan features many “Tools for Safer Streets,” infrastructure like countdown walk signals, leading pedestrian interval stoplights, pedestrian refuge islands and “Stop for Pedestrians” signs. Other strategies include road diets, which remove extra car lanes to make room for wider sidewalks and bike lanes, plus traffic-calming elements like chicanes, speed humps and traffic circles.

Steven interviewed CDOT Commissioner Gabe Klein after Chicago Forward came out, asking if the commissioner really believed all traffic fatalities could be eliminated. “We’re already seeing a downward trend,” Klein explained. “I think [zero fatalities] is achievable. You shoot for zero, you end up at ten. Every life is important, but it’s better than shooting for fifty and ending up at seventy. We have to push ourselves.”


Mural at Chicago Avenue and Lawndale Avenue in East Garfield Park.

This philosophy also should be applied to the murder rate, which is arguably a more pressing problem. According to stats Steven compiled from Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) data, last year 117 people died in crashes while walking, biking or driving within the city. By comparison, there were 435 murders in Chicago that year, according to the police department. On October 29, 2012, the city passed that grim landmark with 436 killings so far this year, and if we continue at the same rate we’ll end 2012 with 523 murders, the highest death toll since 2003. The increase has been blamed on the mild winter and warm spring, as well as gangs splintering into smaller factions after their leaders have been jailed, creating more opportunities for conflict.

While the police have the responsibility for dealing with the aftermath of violence, it’s not their role to address the underlying social causes. These include Chicago’s legacy of segregation, which combined with inequities in education and job discrimination to create large sections of the city with widespread poverty. In these areas, odds are far higher that kids will be born into single-parent homes and affected by alcohol and drug addiction, child abuse and neglect. These conditions make it much more likely that youth will eventually get involved with gangs and guns.

Traditionally the approach to combating homicides has been through the criminal justice system, with a focus on arresting and jailing the perpetrators. The Cure Violence initiative, formerly Ceasefire, uses a radically different method, documented in the 2011 film, “The Interrupters”. Founded here in 2000 by epidemiologist Dr. Gary Slutkin, the program takes a public health approach to violence, treating it as an illness whose spread can be stopped through disease prevention strategies. Outreach workers called violence interrupters, often reformed gang members themselves, patrol the streets to mediate conflicts and prevent revenge shootings. There’s strong evidence this approach helped reduce the murder rate in several Chicago neighborhoods.

“We’re able to get in there, intercept whispers and talk to the people involved,” explained Cure Violence director Tio Hardiman in a Time Out Chicago interview this summer. “You’re not going to stop this [violence] by parachuting in. You’ve got to have boots on the ground to prevent someone from shooting. If we can keep a guy from going to the penitentiary or the cemetery, that’s our role.” In July the city announced a one-million-dollar-a-year contract with the nonprofit to deploy forty violence interrupters in Woodlawn, North Lawndale and Roseland. Judging from Cure Violence’s previous success, this partnership is a step in the right direction.

I’m no expert in homicide prevention, but it seems like a logical next move would be for the city to draft a document, similar to CDOT’s transportation plans, laying out a holistic approach for lowering the murder rate to zero in the next decade. Strategies should involve all the departments that can address the root causes of violence: issues of housing, healthcare, child protection, addiction recovery, education, employment and more.

It might also make sense to create a new city department dedicated to violence prevention, working in tandem with the police. Or perhaps the focus could be on allocating more resources to nonprofits and grassroots groups located within underserved neighborhoods, since these organizations know their communities best.

Dangerous traffic is a universal concern, while street violence may seem irrelevant to those of us who live outside the affected neighborhoods. But in the long run it’s in everyone’s interest to cure our city’s homicide epidemic. Perhaps with a new Zero-in-Ten strategy modeled after the one in CDOT’s transportation plans, we can finally arrive at a more just and peaceful Chicago.

Published by

John Greenfield

John has lived in Chicago since 1989 and has worked a number of bicycle jobs, from messenger to mechanic to managing the Chicago Department of Transportation's bicycle parking program, arranging the installation of over 3,700 bike racks. He writes regularly for Time Out Chicago, Newcity, Momentum and Urban Velo magazines and works at Boulevard Bikes in Logan Square.

17 thoughts on “Could CDOT’s “Zero in Ten” strategy also work for homicide prevention?”

  1. As an old Masser and a bicyclist, I’ve been more aware of the traffic issues and the risk cars pose, but I agree, it’s time to start seeing these two issues in the same frame. I’ve actually meant to mention the need to do this to you, John. I’m glad you’re bringing it into focus.

    I think it’s a lot about class: a lot of the people who are active as bicyclists are educated white middle class folks, and a lot of the people who are dying in gun violence are, you know, not. But a lot of those same folks would benefit most from biking. I think it’s an opportunity.

    1. Peace John Stoner – Good day and trust all is well! Great feedback and I agree that class disparities certainly play into these issues. Though, it feels like race is the primary driver here. I grew up in Chatham, a predominantly Black middle class neighborhood on Chicago’s southside. A disparate strategy to reducing violent crime is the norm in Chatham and other middle class southside neighborhoods. If White Chicago were the primary victims of gun, drug, gang, and violent crimes, the response would be entirely different. We certainly agree on the potential for biking to be used as a community building tool. May this conversation continue…

      1. I was not aware of the situation in places like Chatham. I’m very aware that equating black with poor is wrong (not to mention racist), but I’m sure I need to be educated further.

  2. From my understanding, a lot of the violent crime in this city – especially that on the west and south sides – is gang-related. If we are to reduce this crime to zero, we need to eliminate the gangs. Maybe better education is needed? Or maybe the city can provide for those underprivileged kids so they don’t end up in gangs to begin with?

    This is a much more complicated issue than traffic deaths. We know how to reduce traffic deaths with better road design. It’s a lot less cut-and-dry to stop gang-related violence.

    1. I agree with you that it’s less cut-and-dry (relative to stopping death by car) but we’re so far more focused on catching people after they commit crimes. The police are not crime prevention actors; that role belongs to all of us.

      1. Agreed. The job of preventing crime should fall upon the community. The only way to stop crime before it happens is to fix the situation that is causing the crime to begin with.

    2. Peace Adam – Good points on this. Feels like John Greenfield’s point is that if a comprehensive, holistic strategy is the right approach to reducing traffic deaths, then certainly a comprehensive, holistic strategy is also in order to reduce violent crime in our city. And, to your point many racial disparities must be addressed – unemployment, education, income, healthcare, etc. Far from a cakewalk, yet certainly worth the effort.

      1. Agreed. A lot of the crime is occurring in underserved neighborhoods. I think if the city chose to pay attention to these areas, it could go a long way in preventing some violent crime.

    3. I think a lot is committed by gang members, but it’s not really gang-related. It’s personal. Someone disrespected someone, or someone’s girl, or someone’s brother, cousin, whatever. I think it’s mostly about revenge, not gaining territory or drug market share for a gang.

  3. Hey John Greenfield – Congrats on a great article and for bringing these issues to the biking and sustainable transportation community here in Chicago. Your words follow a logical evolution. In essence, a comprehensive, multifaceted approach to decreasing traffic deaths to zero in ten years is the right approach. Of course, it stands to reason that this same approach makes sense for reducing the more urgent problem of homicides to zero in ten years. You used the word holistic toward the end of the article. I love this word, as it speaks to your comment earlier in the article about addressing the various social challenges that contribute to violence in Chicago – segregation, inequalities, poverty, poor education, unemployment rate, systemic racism, drugs, gangs, and guns, etc. And, i also love your suggestion for a City of Chicago Department of Violence Prevention. For far too long, we’ve treated violence from the law enforcement perspective – more police, more arrests, more convictions, etc. Cure Violence and other orgs seek to treat violence from the public heath, social, education, or other perspectives. The city can play a huge role in creating a holistic umbrella strategy and helping to coordinate all of the various & disparate, yet effective, approaches to “curing violence”. And, they should create that dept and play that role, as they have the resources, gravitas, and organizational structure to help get it done. Great work again John, job well done indeed!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *